Restorative justice, policing and the Big Society

Mar 02, 2011

— filed under: Country:England&Wales, Theory, Support, Potential, Region: Europe, Policy, Politics

from the speech by The Rt Hon Nick Herbert MP, Minister for Policing and Criminal Justice in England:

There has been much talk about restorative justice. We’ve seen encouraging pilots and there’s talk about it not only in this country, but around the world. So why is it that something that offers such encouraging results should not have taken a greater hold in our system?

Well, I think it is because we’ve seen evolving over the last few years a criminal justice system that has been very much directed from the centre.

We’ve been through the recent era of targets and what has eloquently been described as ‘deliverology’. The idea of managing from the centre, of close direction in order to try and drive up the performance of public services. This was done for benign reasons, but we all know what the consequences were.

Restorative justice, policing and the Big Society

One of those consequences was the erosion of professional discretion and a driving of activity in very prescribed forms. I think the consequence of this top-down culture was that we disempowered the frontline across the public sector, but certainly in relation to the criminal justice system. We robbed police officers of their discretion, and we divided criminal justice partners.

...Now I would like to say something else that I think is perhaps challenging.

I believe that we should stop talking about 'diverting' from the criminal justice system. Whilst I know exactly what is meant by this language, I think it’s a problem because it implies that diverting people from the system is some kind of goal in itself, that that is what we aspire to do. It is a problem describing it in that way as we can lose the public and their confidence that crime is being dealt with.

Instead of talking about diversion from the system, what we should really be talking about is transforming the criminal justice system. Transforming it into a service and transforming the way it operates. What we should really be talking about is not diversion but reclaiming justice for communities and ensuring that the way in which justice is delivered is not remote and that the system is not opaque.

We should stop talking about diversion because what we want to do is not see restorative justice as some kind of alternative to the criminal justice system. What we want to see is restorative justice and restorative principles embedded in the criminal justice system as a whole and operating at every part of the criminal justice system.

Read the whole speech.

Document Actions

Report Abuse

Name (Required)

Please enter your full name

E-Mail (Required)

Please enter your e-mail address

Description (Required)

Please state your reasons why you would like to report this comment as abusive. Our administrator will be notified with your message.

Sections

Restorative justice, policing and the Big Society

Document Actions

RJ ,policing and Big Society

Report Abuse

Personal tools


RJOnline Blog 2012 May (17) April (23) March (25) February (21) January (24) 2011 December (22) November (25) October (23) September (22) August (24) July (22) June (22) May (22) April (21) March (24) February (20) January (23) 2010 December (24) November (22) October (21) September (23) August (32) July (41) June (35) May (42) April (38) March (47) February (42) January (43) 2009 December (41) November (46) October (47) September (42) August (46) July (48) June (42) May (32) April (1) March (8) February (1) View all Recent RJOB Comments conference May 07, 2012 conference May 07, 2012 Agreement to participate May 04, 2012 More…	Info Restorative justice, policing and the Big Society Mar 02, 2011 — filed under: Country:England&Wales, Theory, Support, Potential, Region: Europe, Policy, Politics from the speech by The Rt Hon Nick Herbert MP, Minister for Policing and Criminal Justice in England: There has been much talk about restorative justice. We’ve seen encouraging pilots and there’s talk about it not only in this country, but around the world. So why is it that something that offers such encouraging results should not have taken a greater hold in our system? Well, I think it is because we’ve seen evolving over the last few years a criminal justice system that has been very much directed from the centre. We’ve been through the recent era of targets and what has eloquently been described as ‘deliverology’. The idea of managing from the centre, of close direction in order to try and drive up the performance of public services. This was done for benign reasons, but we all know what the consequences were. One of those consequences was the erosion of professional discretion and a driving of activity in very prescribed forms. I think the consequence of this top-down culture was that we disempowered the frontline across the public sector, but certainly in relation to the criminal justice system. We robbed police officers of their discretion, and we divided criminal justice partners. ...Now I would like to say something else that I think is perhaps challenging. I believe that we should stop talking about 'diverting' from the criminal justice system. Whilst I know exactly what is meant by this language, I think it’s a problem because it implies that diverting people from the system is some kind of goal in itself, that that is what we aspire to do. It is a problem describing it in that way as we can lose the public and their confidence that crime is being dealt with. Instead of talking about diversion from the system, what we should really be talking about is transforming the criminal justice system. Transforming it into a service and transforming the way it operates. What we should really be talking about is not diversion but reclaiming justice for communities and ensuring that the way in which justice is delivered is not remote and that the system is not opaque. We should stop talking about diversion because what we want to do is not see restorative justice as some kind of alternative to the criminal justice system. What we want to see is restorative justice and restorative principles embedded in the criminal justice system as a whole and operating at every part of the criminal justice system. Read the whole speech. Document Actions Send this Print this RJ ,policing and Big Society Posted by Ali ohar at Mar 03, 2011 08:09 AM Very encouraging speech by the Honourable MP! Big society may also be taking in other culture not only in the UK. Even in UK there are many Communities, living with in the UK society and practices their old system of Jirga( Pukhtoon of Pakistan-Afghanistan), Punchayat (East and west Punjab) , Sulha Middle eastern ,Gachacha, Padre, Braeza ( African community),Badung (Pilipino)etc. Restorative Justice works very well to update these traditional systems and modernize it with inclusion of RJ component. Such practices even lead to major crime like murder reconciliation and rehabilitation of Offender and victim together. The major problem in UK is there is not a single traditional community centre, like the Pukhtoon Hujra, Punjab culture Dera exist, where there is continuous interaction between the people, elder, youth, women and men and mostly conflict are also resolved. As I am looking for the same since long in Bradford, discuss it with many government officials, local leaders, but the only thing I found is inter-faith groups. Such groups and even police take an issue to the religious institution with out proper interaction, discussion, and consensus building to reconcile the issue and rehabilitate the parties involved in the conflict. As in majority of the cases the law did not allow to do so as per the Govt. official’s reaction to such question. We recently implement the Topic under discussion, police and elders (Jirga) joint projects at the police station level in one the oldest big tribe (society) of Pukhtoon in KPK Pakistan. First start in two districts later extended to eight and now implemented by almost each district of Khyber Pukhtoonkhwa province of Pakistan. The District police head with joint consultation of the elders (Jirga) implement the voluntarily in 24 district which are much expose to violence and of world focus now. Such can be replicated here also if the started on community level, in community centre, not religious institution or at police station where elders and police are jointly trained in traditional and modern RJ system, elders find place for sharing wisdom, experience, discussion, easily accessible to victim to resolve the issue, with mediation, FGS, and circle methods. Please visit the link to see the RJ, Policing and big society example of KPK Pakistan; http://www.facebook.com/l.p[…]tive-justice%2F&h=68dfc Jirga short Introduction; http://www.facebook.com/l.p[…]player_embedded&h=68dfc Ali Gohar Add comment You can add a comment by filling out the form below. Plain text formatting. Name (Required) Tell us your name. E-Mail (Required) Enter your e-mail address. Subject (Required) Comment (Required) Are you a human? (Required)